skipperheartbeat Posted April 22, 2017 Report Share Posted April 22, 2017 I'm getting the below messages in the console log. Are they normal or have i missed something? It was a completely fresh install and database/updates installed on auto. Plays fine as far as i can see. I'm running Debian 8 TrinityCore rev. 224399958d68 2017-04-22 12:26:48 +0200 (3.3.5 branch) (Unix, Release, Static) (worldserver-daemon) Generating spell proc data from SpellMap... Spell Id 6940 has DBC ProcFlags 699048, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 7366 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 18499 has DBC ProcFlags 139944, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 28313 has DBC ProcFlags 1581224, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 32065 has DBC ProcFlags 262144, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 33891 has DBC ProcFlags 174624, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 35244 has DBC ProcFlags 262144, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 36659 has DBC ProcFlags 262144, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 40453 has DBC ProcFlags 1581224, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 40879 has DBC ProcFlags 664096, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 41341 has DBC ProcFlags 1747624, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 44586 has DBC ProcFlags 697000, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 45092 has DBC ProcFlags 664232, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 49145 has DBC ProcFlags 131072, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 50462 has DBC ProcFlags 131752, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 50498 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 51809 has DBC ProcFlags 131752, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 53032 has DBC ProcFlags 81936, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 53578 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 53579 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 53580 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 53581 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 53582 has DBC ProcFlags 16, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 62142 has DBC ProcFlags 69648, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 64205 has DBC ProcFlags 699048, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 66334 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 67905 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 67906 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 67907 has DBC ProcFlags 245760, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 72151 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 72648 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 72649 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Spell Id 72650 has DBC ProcFlags 69972, but it's of non-proc aura type, it probably needs an entry in `spell_proc` table to be handled correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aokromes Posted April 22, 2017 Report Share Posted April 22, 2017 "normal" known, they must be fixed, soon(TM) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aokromes Posted April 22, 2017 Report Share Posted April 22, 2017 --- Canned message start --- It appears the issue in the original post was solved, so this thread shall be closed. Should you encounter any other difficulties, please open a new thread. --- Canned message end --- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts