alurian Posted May 5, 2014 Report Share Posted May 5, 2014 I compiled using visual studio 13 express (12 in cmake) on windows 7 64bit, make sure you have visual C++ redistributable (mines 32 bit x86) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Themeron Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 So ive been following the guide provided (http://collab.kpsn.org/display/tc/How-to_Win) and just finished everything and when i try to run worldserver.exe i get The ordinal 4333 could not be located in the dynamic link library. I tried to google this problem and I found someone elses post about the same problem, I tried what they said which was moving the release folder out of the bin folder, and also tried recompliling. I'm running windows 8.1, downloaded all the programs from the list provided in the guide and should be the correct ones. I'm not to great with these things so help would be much appretiated, also sorry in advance if this is a simple problem and I'm missing something obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mingdynasty Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 I like the "Im not advertising or anything". Good show old chap.. good show... They may say that it's 95%, but what does that even mean? You do know that you are an idiot and fell prey to those false advertising gimmicks, "Hey we have more stuff working than the other guys, come join us!" If you truly believe that they have a "95%" (still don't know what that means). Then go ask them for their source, why are you here? the 95% thingy is my own estimation based on my own experience playing there. After a year or so i havent found a bugged quest so far and all the bosses are scripted Blizzlike (all the released bosses). I dont really care how they did to fix it all. I was just surprised to see the development of trinity's 4.3.4 branch is so far behind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDawg Posted May 7, 2014 Report Share Posted May 7, 2014 I dont really care how they did to fix it all. I was just surprised to see the development of trinity's 4.3.4 branch is so far behind. sigh... You still don't get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradox Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 blizzlike, haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mingdynasty Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 (edited) Dude, what's so funny? Is that so hard to believe ? Is is hard to understand the fact that some people took a TrinityCore version at some point and made it way better than the "official devs" ? It's one thing to work on an antique project (wotlk branch) and a kinda newer one (cata 4.3.4) at the same time and a completely different thing to work exclusivelly for cata 4.3.4. It's quite normal to progress more working on a single project than 2 different projects at the same time. If you dont believe me, u can always ask me by PM to give you their server details and start playing there for a while and test things yourself. If after a while of testing, it turns out that im not right, hell, i will specifically ask to be banned from this site/community. Edited May 8, 2014 by mingdynasty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDawg Posted May 8, 2014 Report Share Posted May 8, 2014 mingdynasty, why are you getting so worked up, regardless if anyone believes you or not? What do you propose this community to do? If people take from what trinitycore has worked for and never gives back, then what do you expect? Yet, people still come here... (including you) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackhat Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Themeron, Did you just finish compiling a new core? If not, did you install any patches recently? Ordinals are an extension of natural numbers, and are commonly found in patches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Themeron Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 Themeron, Did you just finish compiling a new core? If not, did you install any patches recently? Ordinals are an extension of natural numbers, and are commonly found in patches. Ya, I just finished compiling a new core I'm doing everything from scratch for the first time. No patches just followed the front page guide. Is it possible I messed something up while compiling even though I got no errors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradox Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 At the very least, you need to recompile in debug mode, and see if you can get a proper crashlog, that would help us figure out what the problem is, but, I'm guessing you have a 32 bit/64 bit mismatch in some dependency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Themeron Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 When I run debug I get; ------------------------------------------------------------------------ These projects are out of date: ZERO_CHECK - Release Win32 revision.h - Release Win32 ALL_BUILD - Release Win32 Would you like to build them? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I hit yes then and get; Unable to start program 'C:buildReleaseALL_BUILD'. The system cannot find the file specified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aokromes Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 I vote you missed this part:copy libmySQL.dll from C:Program FilesMySQLMySQL Server 5.xlibcopy libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll from C:OpenSSL-Win32bin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Themeron Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 (edited) I vote you missed this part: copy libmySQL.dll from C:Program FilesMySQLMySQL Server 5.xlib copy libeay32.dll and ssleay32.dll from C:OpenSSL-Win32bin Actually had wrong ones in there, took them from wamp by accident lol. Replaced them with right ones Still getting the same Error when debugging. Going to play around for a bit and try to figure it out. Edited May 9, 2014 by Themeron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradox Posted May 9, 2014 Report Share Posted May 9, 2014 I didn't say debug it, I said compile in debug mode, or, relwithdebuginfo (or whatever it's called) mode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSmite Posted May 10, 2014 Report Share Posted May 10, 2014 For what it's worth, ordinal 4333 corresponds to the following function: i2d_PKCS7_bio_stream in libeay32.dll version 1.0.0.2 through 1.0.1.7. Note: You should be using at least 1.0.1.7 which was patched to address the Heartbleed bug. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychobandit Posted May 13, 2014 Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 So, if I am understanding correctly, If we still have Win XP, we are screwed & can no longer use Trinity because we can't install MSVC 2013? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aokromes Posted May 13, 2014 Report Share Posted May 13, 2014 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychobandit Posted May 14, 2014 Report Share Posted May 14, 2014 Hmm.. well that sucks What's the reason for the change? If you don't mind my asking. Was there something that forced it? And another question if you can answer it, What is the last update/patch/date that will compile on XP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aokromes Posted May 14, 2014 Report Share Posted May 14, 2014 c++ 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDawg Posted May 14, 2014 Report Share Posted May 14, 2014 Hmm.. well that sucks What's the reason for the change? If you don't mind my asking. Was there something that forced it? And another question if you can answer it, What is the last update/patch/date that will compile on XP? The world is going x64+ Eventually even U.S. ATM machines will have to go with a newer OS very very soon. Yes.. thats right, its sad but true. There are countless ATM machines that still have XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychobandit Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 Ya I know all that, but there are a lot of companies that see the, I guess I'll call it "Resistance", to update & are going to support XP for the foreseable future. Trinity has been pretty slow on upgading to higher versions of some of the programs (MySQL comes to mind) So I thought I was safe for a while. Oh well, such is life Thanks for the help guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CDawg Posted May 16, 2014 Report Share Posted May 16, 2014 I guess I'll call it "Resistance", to update & are going to support XP for the foreseable future. I could also go back to the stone age while the rest of the world evolves, but even my evolved brain is telling me that isn't a bright idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_icam Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 (edited) I have installed visual studio v2010 and my PC is 64bit. when i click configure and i chose "visual studio 10" it gives me this error : CMake Error at C:/Program Files (x86)/CMake 2.8/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake:61 (message): The C compiler "c:/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 10.0/VC/bin/cl.exe" is not able to compile a simple test program. It fails with the following output: Change Dir: E:/cata server/TrinityCore-4.3.4-master/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp Run Build Command:c:PROGRA~2MICROS~1.0Common7IDEdevenv.com CMAKE_TRY_COMPILE.sln /build Debug /project cmTryCompileExec4047307882 Microsoft (R) Visual Studio Version 10.0.30319.1. Copyright (C) Microsoft Corp. All rights reserved. 1>------ Build started: Project: cmTryCompileExec4047307882, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 1>Build started 5/17/2014 12:50:33 PM. 1>PrepareForBuild: 1> Creating directory "E:cata serverTrinityCore-4.3.4-masterbuildCMakeFilesCMakeTmpDebug". 1>InitializeBuildStatus: 1> Creating "cmTryCompileExec4047307882.dirDebugcmTryCompileExec4047307882.unsuccessfulbuild" because "AlwaysCreate" was specified. 1>ClCompile: 1> Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.30319.01 for 80x86 1> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. 1> 1> cl /c /Zi /W3 /WX- /Od /Ob0 /Oy- /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D _DEBUG /D "CMAKE_INTDIR="Debug"" /D _MBCS /Gm- /RTC1 /MDd /GS /fp:precise /Zc:wchar_t /Zc:forScope /Fo"cmTryCompileExec4047307882.dirDebug" /Fd"E:/cata server/TrinityCore-4.3.4-master/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeTmp/Debug/cmTryCompileExec4047307882.pdb" /Gd /TC /analyze- /errorReport:prompt testCCompiler.c 1> 1> testCCompiler.c 1>LINK : fatal error LNK1123: failure during conversion to COFF: file invalid or corrupt 1> 1>Build FAILED. 1> 1>Time Elapsed 00:00:02.03 ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== CMake will not be able to correctly generate this project. Call Stack (most recent call first): CMakeLists.txt:12 (project) and it has this text on name and value : "name : CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX value : C:/Program Files (x86)/TrinityCore" what should i do? ( Edited May 17, 2014 by Aokromes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aokromes Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 You need Visual Studio 2013, and new glasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a_icam Posted May 17, 2014 Report Share Posted May 17, 2014 You need Visual Studio 2013, and new glasses. my Cmake doesnt have visual studio 13 do you mean older trinity scripts can work with visual studio 2010? on videos that i saw for compile 4.3.4 they used older version for visual studio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts